You are reading...
College Sports, Education

Michael L. Buckner Quoted in Columbus Dispatch Article on Tressel NCAA Rules-Violation

Michael L. Buckner, shareholder of the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm, was quoted in the March 10, 2011, Columbus Dispatch article on Ohio State University head football coach Jim Tressel’s self-reported NCAA rule-violation. The article by Tim May, Jill Riepenhoff, Mike Wagner and Randy Ludlow quoted Buckner in the context of the severity of Ohio State’s self-imposed sanctions against Tressel:

“A person with experience in such NCAA matters said he thinks OSU might have been too lenient.

‘Just looking at it, it may seem a little light, especially in light of the fact Tressel didn’t report it to the university within a reasonable period of time,’ said Michael Buckner, who heads a law firm that helps schools deal with the NCAA.

Tressel didn’t speak with the Ohio State compliance office or his superiors about the e-mails until they were discovered in early January as officials prepared the appeal of the players’ penalties. He also signed a compliance form on Sept. 13 that said he had no knowledge of possible violations.

‘In those periods when he had an opportunity and a duty to disclose, he failed to do so,’ Buckner said. ‘I think the NCAA could also come back and add failure to monitor or failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance. Those are program violations. With those three (including the bylaw 10.1 violation), you could look at the two-game suspension and the fine to be the minimum.’”

Buckner, an attorney and licensed private investigator, represents colleges, universities and coaches in the NCAA enforcement process.


About Michael L. Buckner, Esquire

An attorney who provides clients with internal investigation, civil litigation, estate planning and compliance services.


2 thoughts on “Michael L. Buckner Quoted in Columbus Dispatch Article on Tressel NCAA Rules-Violation

  1. While I agree that OSU’s self-imposed sanctions are “light,” it is better that the school errs on the light side than the harsh side. The worst thing OSU could have done is slap itself with sanctions that the NCAA would not even consider. This way, OSU is taking some action, which the NCAA will likely enhance, but only slightly. On the other hand, had OSU imposed harsh sanctions, the NCAA would not have commented that OSU was too rough on itself and should limit punishment.

    Posted by Darren Heitner | March 10, 2011, 9:35 am
    • I agree with you. The article did not include the rest of my comments to the reporter–which was that universities try to find the “sweet spot” in self-imposing penalties. Ohio State believed the penalties accessed against Tressel were in that sweet spot. I would have advised Ohio State to do probably something along those same lines. Good observation.

      Posted by michaelbucknerlaw | March 10, 2011, 9:38 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: