You are reading...
College Sports, Division I, Division II, Division III

Could USC Promotion of Student-Athlete Twitter Handles Lead to an Enhanced Duty to Monitor?

On August 27, 2012, Nicole Auerbach of USA Today published a story regarding the University of Southern California linking individual student-athlete Twitter handles on the institution’s athletics website. In addition, USC also listed Twitter handles on the football program’s first depth chart. While this could be seen as a lesson in accountability for student-athletes, it may also impose an enhanced duty to monitor social media for the institution’s athletics compliance office.

Currently, the March 12, 2012, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill enforcement case is the primary authority on an institution’s responsibility in terms of monitoring student-athlete social media accounts. In this case, the Committee on Infractions (COI) noted that institutions do not have an absolute duty to regularly monitor social media websites. However, the COI added an institution acquires the duty to do so if it obtains a heightened awareness through a “reasonable suspicion of rules violations”. The COI further explained, “if the membership desires that the duty to monitor social networking sites extend further than we state here, the matter is best dealt with through NCAA legislation”.

Although the COI’s view in the UNC case would not seem to impose an absolute duty for USC to monitor, an institution actually promoting a student-athlete’s social media account on an institutional platform may fall outside this rationale. Because there is no all-encompassing NCAA policy regarding social media, the Michael L. Buckner Law Firm recommends institutions athletic compliance offices work with institutional coaches to implement social media policies and procedures at their institution that address rules-education and monitoring.





About Justin P. Sievert, Esquire

Bar Admissions (North Carolina, Florida and Tennessee) Practice Area (College Sports Law)


One thought on “Could USC Promotion of Student-Athlete Twitter Handles Lead to an Enhanced Duty to Monitor?

  1. Hi Justin – Thank you for your post. As someone who works with athletic departments to provide social media education and communication strategies, I am happy to see USC attach Twitter handles to their player profiles. I’m in the ” creates accountability” camp, so long as the players understand the significance of having their social account promoted. When all student-athletes have been provided a thorough social media/communication/personal branding education, I believe a move like USC’s makes for self-monitoring. USC has said previously they will not employ monitoring services, so it seems this is one step to add responsibility and professionalism to the student-athlete list of talents.

    Have a great day,
    Shanna Bright

    Posted by Shanna Bright | August 28, 2012, 10:58 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: